In recent years, the Supreme Court has made several rulings that can only be described as wrong, legally and ethically. From the legalization of the unconstitutional Obamacare individual mandate, to the rejection of the perfectly reasonable citizenship question on the United States Census, the judicial activism that runs amuck in the lower courts has slipped into the nation’s highest court as well.
In response to the latter ruling, the Trump Administration has shown the resolve that is required in order to resist politically-motivated rulings. Despite the 5-4 ruling against the citizenship question, President Trump declared his intention to see the question added to the 2020 Census regardless, one way or another. Then, just yesterday, Attorney General Bill Barr announced that there is, in fact, a way in which the Administration can legally add the question despite the Court’s ruling.
This is a crucial development because it proves that not only is it possible for the Court to make an incorrect ruling, but that it is legal to defy such a ruling because it was wrongly made. This is the separation of powers at work: If the Court abuses its power as it did in this ruling, then it is a check on the Court’s power to work around the ruling rather than adhere to it.
And it is especially important to take such a strong stand on this issue in particular, since there is so much at stake for the future of our country if the Democrats get their way with the census. This is truly one of the most significant actions by the dynamic duo of President Trump and Attorney General Barr, and for that we should be all the more grateful for their resolve.
The Hill: Barr says Trump administration can legally add citizenship question to census
By Jacqueline Thomsen
Attorney General William Barr said Monday that he believes the Trump administration can legally add a citizenship question to the 2020 census, though the Supreme Court ruled against its inclusion last month.
In an interview with The Associated Press, Barr said he has been in regular contact with President Trump about the question, which the president is determined to see featured on the decennial survey.
“I agree with him that the Supreme Court decision was wrong,” Barr told the AP. The attorney general added that he thinks there is “an opportunity potentially to cure the lack of clarity that was the problem and we might as well take a shot at doing that.”
Barr declined to provide further details to the wire service on how the question will be added to the census.
However, the AP cited a senior official who said President Trump is expected to issue a presidential memorandum to the Commerce Department directing it to include the citizenship question on the 2020 census. Action is expected to be taken in the coming days.
The Hill has reached out to the Justice and Commerce departments for further comment.
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 ruling last month, found that the administration’s stated reason for adding the citizenship question to the census didn’t match up with the evidence in the case.
The justices blocked the question from appearing on the survey for the time being but left an opening for the Commerce Department to provide another reason for the question’s inclusion. The Trump administration had claimed the question was necessary to enforce the Voting Rights Act.
Opponents of the question argued that its inclusion on the census would lead to an inaccurate count of the population, as immigrants might be discouraged from participating. The Department of Justice (DOJ) had argued that the data would not be used for purposes beyond compliance with the voting law, but critics said the perception was enough to cause individuals to skip the question or the survey altogether.
The DOJ initially appeared ready to accept defeat in the legal battles, announcing Tuesday that census materials would be printed without the question. The administration had said in court filings that census materials needed to be finalized by June 30 for a July 1 printing deadline.
But Trump one day later tweeted that those efforts would move forward, appearing to catch even DOJ lawyers on the case by surprise.
“The tweet this morning was the first I had heard of the president’s position on this issue, just like the plaintiffs and Your Honor. I do not have a deeper understanding of what that means at this juncture other than what the president has tweeted,” Joshua Gardner, a DOJ attorney, told a federal judge during a teleconference Wednesday.
“But obviously, as you can imagine, I am doing my absolute best to figure out what’s going on,” he added.
The DOJ also announced late Sunday that it was pulling its entire legal team for the citizenship question off the case, and replacing them with other government lawyers.
That move has fueled speculation that career DOJ lawyers refused to provide another rationale behind the citizenship question after repeatedly citing the Voting Rights Act in court or that officials feared they would no longer be viewed as trustworthy by judges presiding over the cases.
Read the original article here.
AMERICA First is the newest nationally-syndicated radio show in the United States, part of the Salem Radio Network. The host, Sebastian Gorka PhD., served most recently as Deputy Assistant for Strategy to the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, and is author of the New York Times bestselling book “Defeating Jihad.” His latest book is “Why We Fight: Defeating America’s Enemies – With No Apologies.” You can follow him on Twitter @SebGorka, on Facebook, and on Instagram @sebastian_gorka. AMERICA First is available on the iTunes podcast app, streams live at www.sebgorka.com, and is on YouTube. You can contact him here.